Keywords
Insurance; Pay per Use; Pay as you Drive; Adverse Selection; Selection Effects
Abstract
In this paper the effects of the introduction of the so called “pay per use” -insurance products are examined. These products collect data of kilometers driven by policy holders. As a result of this data, policy holders can get a refund on the insurance-premium paid. Since there is a positive correlation between mileage and the risk of causing an accident the refund is granted to low-mileage drivers, so in theory the “pay per use” product is more attractive to low-mileage drivers than to long-distance drivers. The authors examine empirical evidence to find out whether or not it is mainly low-mileage-drivers who choose the “pay per use” product. Secondly, the authors examine whether there are other significant differences between characteristics of “pay per use” policy-holders and “traditional” policy- holders. Therefore a random sample of 4,000 car-insurance - clients (2,000 “pay per use” policy- holders and 2,000 “traditional” policy-holders) is reviewed. In addition the effects of the introduction of “pay per use” products are discussed, in case of a selection effect between low- and high -mileage drivers is observed.
Recommended Citation
Trappl, S., Zehetner, K., & Pichler, R. (2024). The Effect of the Introduction of a »Pay Per Use« Option within motor TPL insurance. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, 2014(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2014.1.5
First Page
73
Last Page
87
Page Count
15
Received Date
17 September 2013
Revised Date
25 October 2013
Accept Date
21 March 2014
Online Available Date
19 May 2014
DOI
10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2014.1.5
JEL Code
D82; C12; G22
Publisher
University of Warsaw