Keywords
market position, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, dominant positi, President of the OCCP
Abstract
This paper assesses the use of qualitative arguments in antitrust proceedings before the Polish Competition Authority relating to abuse of dominance. The article indicates in what number of decisions was the evaluation of market position supported by qualitative research, in relation to the total number of decisions. The paper analyses the content of relevant decisions with respect to the impact of quality-related arguments on the evaluation of the market position of the participant. Presented also is a review of qualitative arguments. Finally, propositions are made concerning an extended approach to the selection of qualitative arguments.
Recommended Citation
Matuszczak-Piasta, J. (2013). Qualitative arguments used in the evaluation of the market position of an undertaking within antimonopoly proceedings. internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny (internet Quarterly on Antitrust and Regulation), 2(5), 68-80. Retrieved from https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/ikar/vol2/iss5/5
First Page
68
Last Page
80
Page Count
12
Publisher
University of Warsaw
