About This Journal
The Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets (JMCBEM) (ISSN 2449-6634) is an international scholarly journal published since 2015 by the University of Warsaw. The submission of manuscripts is free of fee payment. This journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure.
Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets is indexed by Ministry of Science and Higher Education (40 points for publication).
The publication is free of charge. All articles are published on the open-access basis and under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.
Manuscript checking is done using iThenticate which provides plagiarism prevention services to publishers around the world.
Funding
We are pleased to announce that our semiannual "Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets” has received funding from the state budget for a project under the "Development of Scientific Journals" program. The Ministry of Education and Science has granted de minimis aid in the amount of 25 053,00 PLN. The grant will be used to implement a strategy for the development of the journal including activities aimed at raising the level of publishing and editing practices, increasing the impact on the development of science, and maintaining the journal in international scientific circulation.
Miło nam poinformować, że nasz półrocznik „Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets” otrzymał dofinansowanie z budżetu państwa na realizację projektu w ramach programu „Rozwój Czasopism Naukowych”. Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki przyznało pomoc de minimis w wysokości 25 053,00 zł. Dofinansowanie zostanie przeznaczone na realizację strategii rozwoju czasopisma obejmującą działania zmierzające do podniesienia poziomu praktyk wydawniczych i edytorskich, zwiększenia wpływu na rozwój nauki oraz utrzymania się czasopisma w międzynarodowym obiegu naukowym.
Abstracting and indexing information
JMCBEM is currently indexed in:
IDEAS / RePEC ECONPAPERS BazEkon CEJSH Biblioteka Nauki Index Copernicus International DOAJ ERIH PLUS
Reviewers' Section
The editorial office of Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets has been using new Digital Commons editorial system. Therefore, submission of manuscripts and review process have also been updated.
If you have a Digital Commons account, log in below using the email address and password associated with the account.
https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/cgi/submit.cgi?context=jmcbem/
If you do not already have a Digital Commons account, please Sign up.
Fill in the form to sign up. You will receive an email confirming your request for an account. Once you have confirmed your account, you are all set.
https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/jmcbem/
Do you feel your expertise matches the problems covered in the article? Accept an invitation from editor if you are competent to review the article.
Is there a potential conflict of interest? if you work in the same department or institute as one of the authors; if you have worked on a paper previously with an author; or you have a professional or financial connection to the article – please list all of this (or more) when responding to the editor’s invitation for review.
Do you have enough time? As the reviewing of an article can be quite time consuming, please make sure that you will have sufficient time before the deadline stipulated in the invitation to conduct a thorough review. If you feel the review will take you longer to complete than normal, please contact the editor to discuss the matter.
Ethical issues. If you suspect that an article is plagiarized work, please let the editor know, citing the previous work in as much detail as possible. Also if you suspect the results in an article to be untrue (because of e.g. data manipulation) discuss it with the editor.
Confidentiality.Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Consequently, they must not be presented to, or discussed with, others except as authorized by the editor. Also, remember that unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research, unless the author(s) consent of has been obtained. Valuable ideas accessed through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewer identity is not shared with the author. We would like to keep your identity secret from the author(s). To help us protect your identity, please do not reveal your name within the text of your review.
Our Reviewers
2023: Katarzyna Dziewanowska, University of Warsaw, Poland Marcin Gębarowski, Cracow University of Economics, Poland Jakub Górka, University of Warsaw, Poland Agnieszka Kacprzak, University of Warsaw, Poland Elizabeth Kempen, University of South Africa, South Africa Anna Kuźmińska, University of Warsaw, Poland Katarzyna Liczmańska, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland Klaudia Macias, University of Warsaw, Poland Krzysztof Nowak, University of Warsaw, Poland Katarzyna Rozenkowska, University of Warsaw, Poland Małgorzata Szwed, University of Warsaw, Poland Michał Ścibor-Rylski, University of Warsaw, Poland Sapna Taygi Department of Consumer Science, Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, Indie Agnieszka Wiśniewska, University of Warsaw, Poland
2022: Anetta Barska, University of Zielona Góra, Poland Anna Dziadkiewicz, University of Gdańsk, Poland Marcin Gębarowski, Cracow University of Economics, Poland Edyta Gołąb-Andrzejak, Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland Agnieszka Kacprzak, University of Warsaw, Poland Elizabeth Kempen, University of South Africa, South Africa Małgorzata Koszembar-Wiklik, Silesian University of Technology, Poland Jacek Kotarbiński Per Kristav, Lund University, Sweden Anna Kuźmińska, University of Warsaw, Poland Katarzyna Liczmańska, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland Lynn Lim, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestarn Switzerland Krzysztof Nowak, University of Warsaw, Poland Angelika M.Pabian, University of Silesia, Poland Katarzyna Rozenkowska, University of Warsaw, Poland Magda Stachowiak-Krzyżan, Poznań University of Economics and Business Michał Ścibor-Rylski, University of Warsaw, Poland Marika Świeszczak, Unversity od Lodz, Poland Agnieszka Wiśniewska, University of Warsaw, Poland Joanna Wyrwisz, Lublin University of Technology, Poland Jolanta Zarałek, University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
2021: Edyta Gołąb-Andrzejak Afsarul Islam Anna Jasiulewicz Agnieszka Kacprzak Elizabeth Kempen Per Kristav Katarzyna Krot Anna Kuźmińska Lynn Lim Michał Mijal Elnur Nabivi Krzysztof Nowak Mornay Roberts-Lombard Anna Rogala Michał Ścibor-Rylski Anna Tomaszuk Agnieszka Wilczak Agnieszka Wiśniewska
2020: Anna Bianchi Agnieszka Kacprzak Monika Skorek Katarzyna Krot Krzysztof Nowak Michał Ścibor-Rylski Agnieszka Wilczak Marcin Gębarowski Anna Tomaszuk Przemysław Hensel Agnieszka Wiśniewska Muhammad Tahir Jan
2019: Marcin Awdziej Agnieszka Kacprzak Anna Jasiulewicz Katarzyna Krot Mariusz Trojanowski Agnieszka Wilczak Marcin Gębarowski
2018: Katarzyna Krot Anna Jasiulewicz Grzegorz Karasiewicz Agnieszka Wilczak Marcin Gębarowski Ewa Glińska Monika Skorek Mariusz Trojanowski Anna Pawłowska Marcin Awdziej
2017: Marcin Awdziej Joanna Chudzian Marcin Gebarowski Anna Jasiulewicz Grzegorz Karasiewicz Iwona Kowalska Katarzyna Krot Dariusz Siemieniako Mariusz Trojanowski Agnieszka Wilczak
2016: Joanna Chudzian Marcin Gebarowski Grzegorz Karasiewicz Iwona Kowalska Katarzyna Krot Anna Pawłowska Dariusz Siemieniako Mariusz Trojanowski Rafał Zbyrowski
2015: Joanna Chudzian Natalia Gmerek Gracz Leszek Grzegorz Karasiewicz Katarzyna Krot Dariusz Siemieniako Mariusz Trojanowski Agnieszka Wilczak Monika Zajchowska Rafał Zbyrowski
Reviewing Procedure
All submitted articles are reviewed initially by the Editors (the pre-selection procedure), and those selected in the course of this procedure are forwarded to reviewers.
Each article is reviewed in a double-blind review process by two independent reviewers assigned by Editors.
A review is made in writing and ends with the reviewer’s decision on the rejection or admission for publication (review sheet form).
Upon receipt of the review, the Editorial Board informs the authors about the details of reviewers’ comments on the articles and the final decision on the publication taken by the editor-in-chief.Criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript: matching the subject of the Journal; originality of the research method used and of presenting the subject; reliable presentation of previous research; the quality of own research (if applicable); validity of research/theoretical considerations; correct facts, methodology and reasoning; text contribution to the discipline development; selection of literature.
Editors do not return papers that have not been accepted for publication.
Once a year, the editors include a full list of reviewers on the website.
Reviewers’ responsibilities
Editorial decisions The reviewer supports the Editor-in-Chief in taking editorial decisions and may also assist the author in improving his/her work.
Feedback Each selected reviewer who cannot review the paper or knows that rapid preparation of a review will not be possible should inform the editorial secretary.
Objectivity standards Reviews should be objective. Personal criticism of the author is deemed inappropriate. Reviewers should clearly express their views, supporting them with appropriate arguments.
Confidentiality All reviewed papers must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be showed to or discussed with persons other than the authorized editorial secretary.
Anonymity All reviews are anonymous and the Editorial Board does not make authors’ personal data available to reviewers.
Disclosure and conflict of interest Confidential information or ideas that emerge as a result of the review must be kept confidential and may not be used for personal benefit. Reviewers should not review works involving a conflict of interest due to the relationship with the author, company or institution connected with the work.
Confirmation of sources Reviewers should identify publications not referred to by the author of the paper. Any claim that an observation, source or argument has been previously discussed should be supported by an appropriate quotation. The reviewer should also inform the editorial secretary of any significant similarity, partial overlapping of the content of the reviewed paper with any other published work that is known to the reviewer or of suspected plagiarism.
Contact us
Should you have any questions related to Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets please contact us via e-mail: