•  
  •  
 

ORCID

Paul Mukucha: 0000-0002-6264-6574

Keywords

retail operations, abandoned picked goods, price mismatch, and insufficient funds

Abstract

The ever-increasing incidences of abandoned goods at checkout points threaten the viability of retail operations in many supermarkets. Abandoned products are associated with reshelving costs, deteriorating value due to multiple handling, and turning checkout points into a mess. The incidences of dumped goods at checkout points can be reduced if retail operations managers get some insights into the motivations behind such retrogressive consumer behaviour. The need to get such insights led to this study that conducted interviews with customers who had just abandoned their picked products at checkout points. The aim of the study was to find out the reasons behind the abandonment of goods by customers at retail checkout points. To achieve this objective, a phenomenological research approach was adopted. A sample of 30 conveniently selected participants, determined through reaching a saturation point, was interviewed. Data collection took 5 weeks during the months of December 2024 and January 2025. The data was analysed thematically. The results indicated that customers dump products at checkout points due to several reasons, such as insufficient funds, discrepancies between checkout price and shelf price, checkout price unavailability, checkout system failure, and slow-moving queues. The study recommended that supermarkets should engage banks to provide balance inquiry facilities inside or closer to the supermarkets, ensure matching of checkout prices with shelf prices, prompt pricing of new stocks, maintenance of robust service recovery systems, and improve order processing speeds at checkout points.

Acknowledgments

Funding

The research received no funds.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of the article.

Declaration about the scope of AI utilization

The authors did not use an AI tool in the preparation of the article.

First Page

1

Last Page

13

Page Count

13

Received Date

11.04.2025

Revised Date

22.07.2025

Accepted Date

28.08.2025

Online Available Date

15.08.2025

DOI

10.7172/2449-6634.jmcbem.2025.2.1

JEL Code

M31, D12, O55

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Share

COinS