•  
  •  
 

ORCID

Katharina Voss: 0000-0002-5451-0992

Keywords

Booking.com, EU competition law, MFN clause, OTAs, private, enforcement, public enforcement

Abstract

This article studies the private enforcement conducted in Visita v Booking from the perspective of the interaction between public and private enforcement of competition law. This case concerned the question whether the narrow MFN clauses maintained by Booking were contrary to Article 101 TFEU and could therefore be prohibited by a Swedish court. The focus of this article is placed on the assessment carried out by the Swedish courts to determine whether the MFN clauses were restrictive of competition by effect and on the standard of proof attached to the claimant in this regard. With regard to the interaction between public and private enforcement, Visita v. Booking is viewed as an illustration of the increased complexity of competition policy, in particular were novel practices are at issue.

First Page

55

Last Page

71

Page Count

16

Received Date

05.07.2019

Accepted Date

26.09.2019

DOI

10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2020.13.21.2

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Publication Date

2020-09-30

Share

COinS